Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 18th Feb 2013 21:18 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 552903
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[8]: Comment by lucas_maximus
by zlynx on Tue 19th Feb 2013 17:12
in reply to "RE[7]: Comment by lucas_maximus"
RE[8]: Comment by lucas_maximus
by lucas_maximus on Tue 19th Feb 2013 20:38
in reply to "RE[7]: Comment by lucas_maximus"




Member since:
2007-02-18
Why do people accuse me of missing the point when clearly they're the ones to miss my point. Did it occur to you that I wasn't disagreeing with your comment?
Way to go miss the point.
I'd argue Watson is such a huge leap that no one is sure how much of a lead it will end up being. Much like when IBM first invested heavily in general purpose computing. No other tech organization has a Watson in the works.
Then there's all the QM and other science breakthroughs - racetrack memory, atomic imaging, protein folding, cat-brain simulation, various storage miniaturization breakthroughs.
If that kind of science isn't considered leading the tech world, there's something very wrong. Not with IBM, though.