Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 18th Feb 2013 22:28 UTC, submitted by bowkota
In the News "The last time we looked at Silicon Valley's lobbying efforts, Google was the big spender and Apple the piker. That hasn't changed much in the past nine months. In fact, Google increased its political spending in 2012 - a Presidential election year - by nearly 90%, while Apple reduced its by 13%." Anti-SOPA or no, that's a hell of a lot of money. This should be illegal - it's thinly veiled corruption.
Thread beginning with comment 552917
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: not veiled at all
by twitterfire on Tue 19th Feb 2013 14:45 UTC in reply to "RE: not veiled at all"
Member since:

Repeal the 17th? Heck no. My state is *more* corrupt than the Federal government. All of the gerrymandering that takes place to form the US house also exists at the state level. The direct election of senators is the one thing that results in good representation of my state.

You know guys, I know you invented democracy, are the leaders of the free world and bla, bla, but you can, for instance, try to follow EU footsteps and vote directly for members of parliament and for the president, instead of resorting to weird algorithms and gerrymandering.

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[3]: not veiled at all
by jackastor on Tue 19th Feb 2013 15:01 in reply to "RE[2]: not veiled at all"
jackastor Member since:

Lol "weird algorithms" NAILED IT.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: not veiled at all
by Bill Shooter of Bul on Tue 19th Feb 2013 15:59 in reply to "RE[2]: not veiled at all"
Bill Shooter of Bul Member since:

I would love to do that. We'd be much better off if we did. For such a young country historically speaking, we tend to deify our traditional quirks. We tend to judge the means by the outcome, if my party is in power than the process is great!

Reply Parent Score: 3