Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 19th Feb 2013 16:23 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 553008
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
There ere 3 mobile software with the same toolkit (Qt), Ubuntu, Sailfish and Plasma Active, guess witch one is the slower one, the one that use more battery and the one that has the uglier user interface and the one giving poor results: Plasma Active, the one developed in the open and buzzing "architecture", go figure.
Edited 2013-02-19 20:22 UTC
RE[8]: Comment by shmerl
by shmerl on Tue 19th Feb 2013 20:34
in reply to "RE[7]: Comment by shmerl"
RE[7]: Comment by shmerl
by Nelson on Tue 19th Feb 2013 20:22
in reply to "RE[6]: Comment by shmerl"
RE[8]: Comment by shmerl
by shmerl on Tue 19th Feb 2013 20:31
in reply to "RE[7]: Comment by shmerl"
RE[8]: Comment by shmerl
by lucas_maximus on Tue 19th Feb 2013 20:35
in reply to "RE[7]: Comment by shmerl"
To quote Jaron Lanier
There are other cases that involve creativity and imagination. A crowd process generally fails in these cases. The phrase “Design by Committee” is treated as derogatory for good reason. That is why a collective of programmers can copy UNIX but cannot invent the iPhone.
http://www.jaronlanier.com/gadgetcurrency.html
RE[7]: Comment by shmerl
by lucas_maximus on Tue 19th Feb 2013 20:29
in reply to "RE[6]: Comment by shmerl"
I always trust less closed development, and KDE proved to be way better architectured and flexible than Unity on the desktop.
Conjecture.
KDE development is closer to the values of free software. And produces good results as well.
Who cares? Only FSF zealots. Sorry people are going to use what works best now based now and developers will target the devices that real people are using not target something just because it is open source.





Member since:
2010-06-08
I always trust less closed development, and KDE proved to be way better architectured and flexible than Unity on the desktop.
KDE development is closer to the values of free software. And produces good results as well.
See http://www.datamation.com/open-source/desktop-linux-revolt-how-kde-...
Edited 2013-02-19 20:15 UTC