Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 19th Feb 2013 16:23 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 553018
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[10]: Comment by shmerl
by shmerl on Tue 19th Feb 2013 20:44
in reply to "RE[9]: Comment by shmerl"
RE[11]: Comment by shmerl
by Hiev on Tue 19th Feb 2013 21:05
in reply to "RE[10]: Comment by shmerl"
RE[11]: Comment by shmerl
by Nelson on Tue 19th Feb 2013 21:30
in reply to "RE[10]: Comment by shmerl"
Does they warrant a serious look? Certainly not from the videos or screen caps I've seen. Certainly not from an architectural POV or as a new and radical paradigm.
It looks like a worse off, less attractive version of what everyone else is doing.
I feel like KDE is an organization with 2000 names for 1999 useless things. Plasma, Activities, Phonon, Solid, KEverything, who the heck understands this?
Qt and QML are great foundations. The rest of the stack upwards in KDE is complete, utter, garbage.
You cannot seriously expect any reasonable consumer to feel at home with Plasma Active.





Member since:
2005-09-27
You better be, cause is the only advantage Plasma active has.