Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 18th Feb 2013 21:18 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 553048
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
My music collection is > 250GB and I still have a stack of vinyl and CDs yet to copy.
That's lossless, I presume? (if lossy, it would be easily half a year of music without repeating
) In that case, "encode to lossy on copy" to a portable player is a very workable solution, and would end up in something like 30 GiB.




Member since:
2007-03-26
I meant, for others who don't do much video watching while commuting. For those that do, they can store a few videos locally. Its not ideal, but then again, no tablet has a good solution for this on a decent scale.
erm, any tablet is a decent solution for this.
I think you're getting a little carried away with the > 128GB figures. My point was just that many people do use local storage on tablets.
My music collection is > 250GB and I still have a stack of vinyl and CDs yet to copy. So yeah, some other people really are that different from you.
I'm not 100% happy today with how things are, but I do see the potential and where things are going. I don't dispute there are rough edges and limitations, I just dispute the impact of said limitations. They're no more major than the rough edges that Windows Vista or Windows 7 had. Product engineering is not perfect, and given a finite set of resources and the logistics of the matter, I can understand why trade offs had to be made.
To be frank, that's just making excuses.
Microsoft have one of the deepest pockets and best research labs in IT. If anyone should have been capable of pulling off a decent tablet, it should have been Microsoft.
Edited 2013-02-20 00:24 UTC