Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 15th Feb 2013 10:40 UTC
General Development "Since I left my job at Amazon I have spent a lot of time reading great source code. Having exhausted the insanely good idSoftware pool, the next thing to read was one of the greatest game of all time: Duke Nukem 3D and the engine powering it named 'Build'. It turned out to be a difficult experience: The engine delivered great value and ranked high in terms of speed, stability and memory consumption but my enthousiasm met a source code controversial in terms of organization, best practices and comments/documentation. This reading session taught me a lot about code legacy and what helps a software live long." Hail to the king, baby.
Thread beginning with comment 553071
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[8]: Comment by ilovebeer
by ilovebeer on Wed 20th Feb 2013 07:43 UTC in reply to "RE[7]: Comment by ilovebeer"
ilovebeer
Member since:
2011-08-08

You can quit this stupid double speak now.

Umm... What are you rambling about? If telling you directly I wasn't calling you out specifically doesn't soothe your butthurt then I guess your confidence really is shot and the shoe fits. Unfortunately lashing out won't solve either of those problems.

"And the fact that sometimes a persons difficulty in maintaining code is the result of the maintainers inability or inexperience as a coder in general or in a specific area, and not the actual code itself. No sane person with half a clue would disagree with either of those statements."

*Sometimes* that is true, but your initial claim that code and designs can't be bad as long as they work was completely naive. There's nothing more to say here since this is obviously true to everyone else.

That's nice. Only one problem... I never said designs can't be bad as long as they work. I said if they work as intended and are stable then they were engineered correctly.

I don't know why you try to be deceiving but whatever the reason, it's pretty dumb. If it's a matter of not paying attention to what's actually being said, maybe you should start....

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[9]: Comment by ilovebeer
by Alfman on Wed 20th Feb 2013 14:33 in reply to "RE[8]: Comment by ilovebeer"
Alfman Member since:
2011-01-28

ilovebeer,

"Umm... What are you rambling about? If telling you directly I wasn't calling you out specifically doesn't soothe your butthurt then I guess your confidence really is shot and the shoe fits. Unfortunately lashing out won't solve either of those problems."

You're still doing it, it's totally immature, but then you already know that and it was your intention all along. Grow up. I try to take the discussions seriously and here you are continuing to fling insults without cause. I've been more patient than you deserve; it's just very disappointing to have this caliper of discussion on osnews. Obviously your just going to reply with more unprovoked insults, it's totally lame.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[10]: Comment by ilovebeer
by ilovebeer on Wed 20th Feb 2013 16:01 in reply to "RE[9]: Comment by ilovebeer"
ilovebeer Member since:
2011-08-08

"Umm... What are you rambling about? If telling you directly I wasn't calling you out specifically doesn't soothe your butthurt then I guess your confidence really is shot and the shoe fits. Unfortunately lashing out won't solve either of those problems."

You're still doing it, it's totally immature, but then you already know that and it was your intention all along. Grow up. I try to take the discussions seriously and here you are continuing to fling insults without cause. I've been more patient than you deserve; it's just very disappointing to have this caliper of discussion on osnews. Obviously your just going to reply with more unprovoked insults, it's totally lame.

If you took discussions seriously then you would make more of an effort to pay attention to detail and is actually being said. You wouldn't intentionally misquote or misrepresent what has been said. Being deceitful is not how to have good debate. You claim I'm naive, then immediately agree with me. You put on a display after a general comment hits too close to home for you (I guess), and after being told it wasn't directed at you specifically, you put on an even bigger display. You're guilty of all this and more, but pretend you haven't provoked anything.

Your deceitfulness and erratic behavior is what's disappointing because you don't seem to be an idiot. Then again it gets you more attention than you would get otherwise, which may have been your issue all along -- a need for attention. Go ahead making false claims and lashing out. Sadly it's what I've come to expect from you.

Reply Parent Score: 2

BallmerKnowsBest Member since:
2008-06-02

"You can quit this stupid double speak now.

Umm... What are you rambling about? If telling you directly I wasn't calling you out specifically doesn't soothe your butthurt then I guess your confidence really is shot and the shoe fits. Unfortunately lashing out won't solve either of those problems.
"

So Alfman calls you on your painfully-transparent attempts at underhanded insults, and what's your response? Deny it... and then immediately fall back into the same weaselly, passive-aggression that he called you on in the first place (all in the same paragraph, no less). If nothing else, I do have to admire that level of shameless audacity.

Reply Parent Score: 2