Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 20th Feb 2013 11:40 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 553293
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Cool, but could also be ridicule
by leos on Thu 21st Feb 2013 16:31
in reply to "RE[5]: Cool, but could also be ridicule"
I assume you are implying that you would be more likely to trust Apple to make this since they are not an advertising company... I mean really, who else could you POSSIBLY be talking about...
Interesting how there was no mention of Apple but somehow you immediately jump to that conclusion and launch on a tangent. Obsessed much?
RE[7]: Cool, but could also be ridicule
by galvanash on Thu 21st Feb 2013 20:36
in reply to "RE[6]: Cool, but could also be ridicule"
Interesting how there was no mention of Apple but somehow you immediately jump to that conclusion and launch on a tangent. Obsessed much?
I figured you were new here, but your profile says otherwise...
How could you possibly have been here 8 years and not know that the only thing Tony post's about is Apple???
Of course he meant Apple - Im not jumping to a conclusion. If he cannot link the topic at hand to either making Apple look good, or making one of their competitors look bad - well he doesn't bother posting.
Really, just go read the last 40 or so posts he has made... Find one that isn't either cheer leading for Apple or ridiculing a competitor.





Member since:
2006-01-25
I assume you are implying that you would be more likely to trust Apple to make this since they are not an advertising company... I mean really, who else could you POSSIBLY be talking about...
So what is an "advertising company"? Isn't it a company that sells access to it's users eyeballs, making revenue by charging a fee for such access?
http://advertising.apple.com/
Well?
Yes, I realize there is a rather large difference in scale between Apple's small scale endeavor and what Google does... But I would argue it doesn't matter - your argument is about principle, so it is the principle that counts.
If Apple took an official stance and publicly stated "we are a technology company - we aren't interested in making money through advertising" then I might actually agree with your point. But they don't. They are just as much an "advertising company" as Google is - they are simply not as good at it yet. So they make vastly more money selling hardware, but that in no way gives them any moral high ground - i.e. it is no reason to "trust them" to make something like this product any more or less than Google.
If they are willing to pursue revenue through selling access to their users, well they are advertising company - the scale doesn't matter.
Name such a non-advertising company?
Samsung maybe
I think the problem is the concerns you are raising are based on a completely false premise. Maybe if you reply here that you meant Samsung or HTC or some other "pure" hardware maker would make you feel better... But we all know those were not the alternatives you were thinking of when you wrote this.
I personally think you are maybe just a tad bitter because Apple didn't think of this one first