Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 21st Feb 2013 18:18 UTC, submitted by twitterfire
Games Late last night, Sony unveiled the PlayStation 4 - sort of. It's got a custom 8-core AMD x86-64 processor, 8GB of GDDR5 RAM, and a custom Radeon-based graphics chip. It's also got additional chips to offload specific tasks like video (de)compression (livestreaming is built-in!), and there's a large focus on streaming games, but most of it is "an ultimate goal" instead of a definitive feature. It won't play PS3 discs (but will eventually stream many PS3 games), and, while there's some weaselwording involved, second hand games are safe. The biggest surprise? The console itself wasn't shown because it's not done yet. No joke. No price, no release date (other than somewhere before the holidays).
Thread beginning with comment 553350
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Not impressive
by Wafflez on Thu 21st Feb 2013 20:04 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Not impressive"
Member since:

But SSD raids do not pass trim command and performance degrades over time, or did they fixed that?

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[4]: Not impressive
by lucas_maximus on Thu 21st Feb 2013 20:09 in reply to "RE[3]: Not impressive"
lucas_maximus Member since:

I learnt the hard way. The RAID 0 failed.

I got RAID 1 so I can swap another drive in there if one of the SSD fail.

It isn't perfect.

I dunno if Windows 7+ sorts that or not. I am not that bothered. For 2 years I had more than 300mb/s transfer rate. The performance was worth it.

Edited 2013-02-21 20:11 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2