Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 21st Feb 2013 20:48 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 553429
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Plus a shit screen resolution.
Which plays 1920x1080 movies with 1:1 pixel matching and plays games without taxing the GPU much (playing games in 1920 x 1080 -compared to a higher resolution- allows for more effects).
I hate the "more pixels is better" motto and the whole "retina" hype. With "retina", you are essentially taxing the GPU more in order to push more pixels than your eye can really see from a normal distance (15cm for tablets and phones, 30cm for laptops). For a 17inch laptop, you don't need more than 1920x1080 for normal viewing distances. For normal viewing distances, it already exceeds the limits of your eye.
That's unpossible.
More pixels are always better. ALWAYS. The eye has nothing to do with it. Better hardware is always better. That's why we buy better hardware. Because it's better and has more numbers.
Are you trying to telling me I wouldn't be able see pixels at the molecular level? In the future I will be watching 50 episodes of Full House simultaneously on my fingernail and we'll see who the big dummy is.





Member since:
2010-09-25
Plus a shit screen resolution.