Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 26th Feb 2013 21:31 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 553699
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-04-15
You say distributing underage porn when the definition of barely legal implies legality and has nothing to do with child porn?
W.
T.
F?
So the SOPA/PIPA/etc seem like a good idea as well? You know, if it's for unsubstantiated quasi-legal reasoning. with no recourse for allowing legitimate traffic through.
I can't wait till they start deleting emails from google or microsoft accounts because there could be something they aren't aware of inside the email...
Edited 2013-02-26 22:26 UTC