Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 25th Feb 2013 14:15 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 553709
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[8]: Phones vs. Tablets vs. TV vs, Connectability
by Alfman on Tue 26th Feb 2013 23:17
in reply to "RE[7]: Phones vs. Tablets vs. TV vs, Connectability"
Fergy,
"The problem with smarttvs is that the 'smart' is integrated. If you have removable smarts you don't have a smarttv anymore. At best you have a tv with supplied settop box."
Is there a real point to this or are you just arguing over semantics? Why can't a smart tv have an upgradable computer slot? In any case I'm more interested in discussing the technological aspects than arguing over semantics.




Member since:
2006-04-10
"And that is exactly what the people who don't want a smarttv want."
Not sure how you missed it, but *I* want a smart tv and it *is* what I want. Ideally the smart tv computers would be interchangeable between brands, but that's probably a very long ways off after one brand wins the market over and becomes a defacto standard. We could do better if everyone would only work together towards a unified standard, but that doesn't seem to be in the cards with today's manufacturers wanting exclusive control over the entire experience.
The problem with smarttvs is that the 'smart' is integrated. If you have removable smarts you don't have a smarttv anymore. At best you have a tv with supplied settop box.