To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Not sure: SD is a standard or a de facto standard like FAT?
Motorola used FRAND patents = when a new standard was defined motorola said (and signed) that it want it's patents to be use for that standard.
I don't think the same happened to MS, sd manufactures just used it to be compatible with Windows by default. They could have used a different file system and provide the drivers, but would hurt the adoption rate (format your card with ext2/3/4 and see that it just works on linux).
Of course you are partialy right from the ethical point of view. But the law is the law and motorola chose from the beginning to make that patents FRAND while MS didn't.
Not really; There's nothing stopping them from just using an ext filesystem, and telling users to install software if they want to access it through an adapter.
Most users access it through their phone via USB, when they want to put stuff on it, so there is really no reason to ensure that it can be read out of the box by windows and OS X.
Just thought I would chime in here - FAT32 can handle up to 2TB partitions just happily. The default MS tools for formatting cuts the support off at like 32gb, but that is an artificial limit. I have a 1tb HDD formatted to FAT32 that I use for easy file exchange between various new and old OSes just because it was the simplest option. exFAT is NOT a requirement, though it probably is a slightly better FS.
Edited 2013-03-01 21:49 UTC





Member since:
2010-09-25
FAT32 is not a standard, it's a filesystem.
Samsung developed F2FS (currently in the linux kernel) and it's designed for flash storage, I'm curious what will come out of it.