Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 27th Feb 2013 01:59 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 553805
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
When you open the source code of the page it says Frontpage, not sure if that was actually used, if so my guess is that Frontpage created a page which is broken, but broken in a way that still displays correctly in IE.
the last frontpage-release was 2003
i'd say the site is as standards-complient as it was possible back then
which means there were no standards
RE[4]: That's cool.
by Bill Shooter of Bul on Wed 27th Feb 2013 20:46
in reply to "RE[3]: That's cool."




Member since:
2007-09-22
This is not true.
Different browsers render different broken HTML in different ways.
You can find broken HTML which renders better in Chrome, Firefox or Opera than IE too.
Also have a look at my other comment:
http://www.osnews.com/permalink?553804
When you open the source code of the page it says Frontpage, not sure if that was actually used, if so my guess is that Frontpage created a page which is broken, but broken in a way that still displays correctly in IE.
Edited 2013-02-27 12:26 UTC