Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 1st Mar 2013 22:20 UTC
Legal Judge Lucy Koh has almost halved the $1 billion in damages the jury awarded to Apple. "Koh found two main errors in the way the jury calculated the damages awarded to Apple. They used Samsung's profits to determine the amount the company owed for infringing some of Apple's utility patents - a practice only appropriate when calculating damages owed when design patents have been infringed. They also erred when calculating the time period Apple should be awarded damages for. Koh explains that Apple was only due damages for product sales that occurred after Cupertino informed Samsung of its belief that the violations were taking place." It's almost as if the bunch of random people in this jury had no clue what they were doing in what is possibly the most complex patent trial in history.
Thread beginning with comment 554039
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Let's...
by bowkota on Fri 1st Mar 2013 22:42 UTC
bowkota
Member since:
2011-10-12

We would all be better off if we got rid of software and hardware patents.
Unfortunately, this doesn't seem likely any time soon.

Good news for Samsung though; could use the money to spend on:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2013/feb/22/samsung-copy-paste...

http://www.theverge.com/2013/2/27/4035064/samsung-wallet-app-apple-...

Reply Score: 1

RE: Let's...
by Johann Chua on Sat 2nd Mar 2013 23:49 in reply to "Let's..."
Johann Chua Member since:
2005-07-22

Do you mean software and design patents? Hardware patents are kinda important.

Reply Parent Score: 2