Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 3rd Mar 2013 13:48 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless At TechCrunch, Jolla's CEO Marc Dillon explains why his company will focus on China, Finland, and the rest of Europe first, ignoring the US. "The US market is not on the radar as yet, as he says the patent landscape there 'raises a barrier' of entry to newcomers (he's especially critical of overly aggressive use of design patents)." Considering the patent mess in the US is only getting worse, expect to see more of this in the future. Jolla is making a wise decision by ignoring the US - as a young technology company, you're far better off focusing your attention elsewhere.
Thread beginning with comment 554097
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: A few words
by nej_simon on Sun 3rd Mar 2013 21:43 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: A few words"
nej_simon
Member since:
2011-02-11

"[q]What makes it a Facebook-phone? The fact that there's built-in support for Facebook? Well, gee, I've got this Android - tablet, this Android - phone, Windows 8 - laptop, Nokia N900 and so on and so forth that all do the same thing...


Did you read the article? He talks specifically about creating a phone for facebook. So the collaboration with facebook is what would make it a facebook-phone.
"

Did you read the article? He basically says that they want to license out the OS to companies that don't have the skillset to create their own phones, so if Facebook wanted to create their own phone, they could have SailfishOS as the base. Makes logical sense to me. SailfishOS itself and the Jolla Phone isn't going to be a 'Facebook' phone. [/q]

Yes? That's exactly what I was referring to.

Edited 2013-03-03 21:52 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[5]: A few words
by sparkyERTW on Mon 4th Mar 2013 13:35 in reply to "RE[4]: A few words"
sparkyERTW Member since:
2010-06-09

"Did you read the article? He basically says that they want to license out the OS to companies that don't have the skillset to create their own phones, so if Facebook wanted to create their own phone, they could have SailfishOS as the base. Makes logical sense to me. SailfishOS itself and the Jolla Phone isn't going to be a 'Facebook' phone.


Yes? That's exactly what I was referring to.
"

Then congratulations, sir: you've successfully made a mountain out of a mole hill.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[6]: A few words
by nej_simon on Mon 4th Mar 2013 13:38 in reply to "RE[5]: A few words"
nej_simon Member since:
2011-02-11

"[q]Did you read the article? He basically says that they want to license out the OS to companies that don't have the skillset to create their own phones, so if Facebook wanted to create their own phone, they could have SailfishOS as the base. Makes logical sense to me. SailfishOS itself and the Jolla Phone isn't going to be a 'Facebook' phone.


Yes? That's exactly what I was referring to.
"

Then congratulations, sir: you've successfully made a mountain out of a mole hill. [/q]

Err.. What the hell are you talking about?

The hypothetical facebook-phone mentioned by OP would be a facebook-phone because it would be created in collaboration with facebook. I don't see how that is "making a mountain out of a mole hill" so please explain. But perhaps you're just trolling.

Edited 2013-03-04 13:54 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2