Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 6th Mar 2013 19:00 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 554397
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: First few Mac OS X releases?
by MOS6510 on Thu 7th Mar 2013 05:30
in reply to "First few Mac OS X releases?"
RE[2]: First few Mac OS X releases?
by Thom_Holwerda on Thu 7th Mar 2013 09:52
in reply to "RE: First few Mac OS X releases?"
Don't take it too serious. Thom likes to include jabs at Apple (products) even though the story is not related to Apple.
How to spot a fanboy: ignoring reality so hard in order to try and change the very fabric of space and time itself.
I'll just refer to John Siracusa, okay? The first developer previews of Mac OS X - DP1 through 4 - were all terrible. The public beta? Terrible. 10.0? Terrible. 10.1? Little bit better, but still terrible. 10.2? We're getting somewhere, but still not any good.
Those are the cold and hard facts. Deny them all you want, but the first slew of public Mac OS X releases were terrible, and everyone who's not a fanboy knows that all too well.





Member since:
2005-07-06
It wasn't the "first few" Mac OS X releases that were bad, it was the first one or at most two (my cousin, who's a graphic designer, had one that ran Puma, and that was pretty reliable). It was certainly ready for public consumption from Jaguar, and my first ran Panther and that was superb.
In fact, Macs dual booted with Mac OS 9 when OS X was first released. It was essentially a technology preview, and most people still had old style Mac apps.