Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 6th Mar 2013 19:00 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 554400
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by BeamishBoy
by Nelson on Wed 6th Mar 2013 23:09
in reply to "RE: Comment by BeamishBoy"
RE[3]: Comment by BeamishBoy
by tylerdurden on Thu 7th Mar 2013 04:38
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by BeamishBoy"
Yeah, Windows RT apparently does not support the low power 5th core in the Tegra3. Which is why they used the lower clock frequency to reduce overall power consumption. Basically MS used a brute force HW approach to deal with the shortcomings of their own OS scheduler. I assume Microsoft had to get something out of the door pronto, before the iPad or Android get entrenched further.
Edited 2013-03-07 04:49 UTC





Member since:
2005-12-04
On performance, note that Thom was referring to the ARM-based Surface RT, which will be many people's first impression of the platform. A more high end Intel machine should obviously be faster/less laggy.