Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 5th Mar 2013 23:41 UTC, submitted by Nth_Man
Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu "HP, the worlds biggest PC vendor as of 2012, has today launched a brand new all-in-one PC running Ubuntu. But the real 'wow' factor comes from its pricing. At just GBP 349 HP have pitched the PC well within the reach of your average consumer. A similar, though not identical, model is also available with Windows 8 priced at GBP 499."
Thread beginning with comment 554442
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: For a desktop system
by BushLin on Thu 7th Mar 2013 09:30 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: For a desktop system"
Member since:

Chill out, the GPU is more than capable of 1080p video, a cheap ass card from years ago can accelerate h.264 at high bitrate and resolution.

I'm sorry this isn't a PC for you, I wouldn't buy one either but complaining it won't play games properly is missing the point. This is a cheap machine for big screen browsing and e-mail, that's all most people need. Looks good value to me for all the features you get if you'd look past the clock rates and GPU grunt.

Keep in perspective that AMD have a 28nm replacement for this chip in the coming months (Kabini) that's a complete low power SoC, I'm sure HP are getting the current chips for a steal and will have something to follow this up with (rather than just adding further features to an E-350).

I'm not saying that it won't be a failure, maybe they'll not properly set up acceleration or Ubuntu will push out updates which break important things but if won't fail for the reasons you state.

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[4]: For a desktop system
by Kivada on Fri 8th Mar 2013 06:50 in reply to "RE[3]: For a desktop system"
Kivada Member since:

OK, so what combo of kernel, and drivers allows XvBA to run? Have I missed something when it comes to AMD's drivers?

Because last I checked while the hardware is more then capable of it the drivers on Linux still don't have the ability to make use of the GPU's video codec offloading capabilities. Else every video you play is going to have to be played on THE CPU, which this particular model is not exactly up to the task of doing since it's meant to be in a 9"-12.1" laptop.

Hence why I said you'd need a CrystalHD chip to make this thing a passable system for modern content.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[5]: For a desktop system
by BushLin on Fri 8th Mar 2013 09:29 in reply to "RE[4]: For a desktop system"
BushLin Member since:

I didn't come here for an argument, things have probably changed since you last checked.

Hardware H.264 decoding in XBMC is fine with the propitiatory driver; to be fair, hardware MPEG-2 isn't complete yet but that isn't something the CPU will have trouble with.

Instead of an unnecessary chip replicating hardware functions already present, it'd surely be better to have the masses create a bigger demand for the finishing touches in areas like this.

Reply Parent Score: 2