To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Just because most Apple users haven't used early OS X releases and the situation was a decade ago, that doesn't mean that objectively, early OS X releases didn't suck. It's a parallel to offer some perspective on how jarring these transitions can be and how over time these new environments improve, even though they sucked really hard at the beginning.
You tend to compare things people don't know anything or much about with things most people do know about.
Here Thom is comparing Microsoft Surface, which most people have no experience with, with beta versions of OS X, which most people have no experience with and they're over a decade old. OS X is a desktop OS, Surface is a tablet thing.
It's not really helpful in any way. They people that do have experience with early OS X even seemed confused, but it turns out Thom was very liberal on who got to join the early OS X version club.
I don't think he even needed to make a comparison with anything to make it clear he things Surface sucks. If he really wanted to make one he should have picked something more recent.
It would have made more sense to make a comparison with another Microsoft product, because that could give a kind of indication how they will handle the situation. We know Microsoft tends to have a long breath and improve with time. Apple is more inclined to cancel products that don't do well.
But as I've said no comparison with anything is really needed. Just say you think it sucks and explain why.





Member since:
2011-05-12
It's a badly drawn parallel. The main reason being you are referring to a situation over a decade ago and most readers will have not used any OS X developer or beta releases. Most Apple users even haven't.
But thank you for explaining, despite your strange urge to include insults. I doubt this is also a common thing writers do.