Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 7th Mar 2013 20:47 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 554609
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: Comment by Nelson
by jared_wilkes on Fri 8th Mar 2013 02:47
in reply to "RE[6]: Comment by Nelson"





Member since:
2009-03-13
To defend the devil, H264 could be as vulnerable to OnTech patents as VP8 is to MPEG-LA ones. That gives some amount of safety. While patent sanctuary is definitely a stretch, one should not succumb to FUD - and that is what Google in my opinion is fighting for.
As we established in other thread, anything could be patent encumbered so why not make a case for not using zlib, XML or any other technology now widely in use.
Let's not succumb to FUD.