Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 8th Mar 2013 22:01 UTC
Apple John Siracusa: "On paper, the Mac Pro may no longer be a viable product, but it would be a mistake for Apple to abandon the concept that it embodies. Like the Power Mac before it, the Mac Pro was designed to be the most powerful personal computer Apple knows how to make. That goal should be maintained, even as the individual products that aim to achieve it evolve." I agree wholeheartedly. The Mac Pro - and the PowerMac before it - are amazing products, and I would be quite sad to see them go. They may not always lead the pack in performance, but when it comes to sheer engineering and interior design, they are among the very best. I have zero need for a Mac Pro, but to this day, I always take a few minutes to admire it whenever I pay a visit to my Apple retailer.
Thread beginning with comment 554903
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Want upgradeability
by ameasures on Sat 9th Mar 2013 23:00 UTC in reply to "Want upgradeability"
Member since:

The Mac Pro never was a "halo" model - it was a Mac that came in a form factor that would be familiar to anyone from PC-land. he attraction of the Mac Pro should be easy upgradeability - it should be a Mac that you can fit things like memory, hard drives, graphics cards, etc as easily as to a PC. You can do that with even a relatively low-end PC; you have to pay thousands to get a Mac that can do that.

Yes, the Apple MacPro machines weren't cheap however given a comparable high end specification of scalability, reliability and performance: the Apple pricing was not much different to other suppliers (and at times cheaper).

It surprised me when I first hit this on behalf of clients.

Reply Parent Score: 2