Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 3rd Nov 2005 19:20 UTC
"Excellent open source Outlook Express alternatives are available which provide similar and additional features. Such is the case with Mozilla's Thunderbird, which is available for Windows, Mac, and Linux users. Moving away from Outlook Express is a no-brainer, as our screen shots illustrate."
Thread beginning with comment 55492
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Why replace one crap program with another one ?
by on Fri 4th Nov 2005 07:30
in reply to "RE: Why replace one crap program with another one ?"
Member since:Outlook sucks at syncing with IMAP folders. I've had a mess after installing Outlook 2003. Then, I couldn't set it to save my sent mail to whatever folder I wanted... maybe I'm too new to it, but didn't find an answer on the net either...
well IMAP is nothing to write home about for starters. Of course outlook has its faults too.
Anyway, the best mail client is mail (unix people know better 
)
If I wanted to experience the stoneage of email I'd just switch to pine personally.
RE[3]: Why replace one crap program with another one ?
by setuid_w00t on Fri 4th Nov 2005 16:24
in reply to "RE[2]: Why replace one crap program with another one ?"
Member since:2005-10-22
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2005-07-06
Outlook sucks at syncing with IMAP folders. I've had a mess after installing Outlook 2003. Then, I couldn't set it to save my sent mail to whatever folder I wanted... maybe I'm too new to it, but didn't find an answer on the net either...
).
Anyway, the best mail client is mail (unix people know better