Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 8th Mar 2013 16:13 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 554937
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-24
So, the keyword here is "typically", cause I know that Qt gets the right to re-license your code, so both are in the same category.
I'd vote you up if I could - I didn't realize the Qt CLA was so broad (and it indeed is).
The difference that you retain the right to re-license your own code is still a huge difference between copyright assignment and (almost all) CLA's of course.