Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 10th Mar 2013 13:07 UTC
Multimedia, AV A few days ago, Google and the MPEG-LA announced that they had come to an agreement under which Google received a license for techniques in VP8 that may infringe upon MPEG-LA patents (note the 'if any'). Only a few days later, we learn the real reason behind Google and the MPEG-LA striking a deal, thanks to The H Open, making it clear that the MPEG-LA has lost. Big time. Update: Chris Montgomery: "The wording suggests Google paid some money to grease this along, and the agreement wording is interesting [and instructive] but make no mistake: Google won. Full stop."
Thread beginning with comment 554957
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Why?
by Thom_Holwerda on Sun 10th Mar 2013 15:08 UTC in reply to "Why?"
Member since:

So is VP9, buddy.

Reply Parent Score: 8

v RE[2]: Why?
by bowkota on Sun 10th Mar 2013 15:16 in reply to "RE: Why?"
RE[3]: Why?
by Thom_Holwerda on Sun 10th Mar 2013 15:21 in reply to "RE[2]: Why?"
Thom_Holwerda Member since:

You link to Florian Mueller, who is paid by Microsoft and Oracle, who has been consistently proven wrong on just about everything he says.

You'll have to do better than that.

Reply Parent Score: 10