Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 10th Mar 2013 13:07 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 554973
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
No, I suspect that Google went with the what we did wasn't infringement strategy first. My reasoning would have Google admit it infringed but that it was allowed. But the Sun CEO is on record in the first trial stating that Google was allowed to do what they did.
"Google's defenses of implied license and waiver are rejected on the merits and Google's defenses of equitable estoppel and laches are denied as moot".
-- The Judge's order on Google's argument that they got permission from Sun's CEO.




Member since:
2006-01-14
No, I suspect that Google went with the what we did wasn't infringement strategy first. My reasoning would have Google admit it infringed but that it was allowed. But the Sun CEO is on record in the first trial stating that Google was allowed to do what they did.