Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 10th Mar 2013 13:07 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 554984
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[8]: Comment by Nelson
by Thom_Holwerda on Sun 10th Mar 2013 16:43
in reply to "RE[7]: Comment by Nelson"
"
It's a list of companies that support WebM/VP8, and therefore, will not sue anyone for using it. Call it what you will, but the effective outcome is the same.
It's a list of companies that support WebM/VP8, and therefore, will not sue anyone for using it. Call it what you will, but the effective outcome is the same.
That's a herculean leap. "
Considering loads of companies already implement VP8 in hardware (TI, Nvidia, Samsung, and more), there's no leap at all. Just plain reality.
RE[9]: Comment by Nelson
by Nelson on Sun 10th Mar 2013 16:48
in reply to "RE[8]: Comment by Nelson"
Could they have sued them in the first place, regardless? Might as well add me to the list of supporters.
Everyone on that list is not some patent holder who even has the means with which to sue, if they were, they'd be paraded as patent holders. They're not.
You're being dishonest. The MPEG LA is a pool of patent holders who agree to sell you a license to their patents at a group rate. WebM has an HTML page.
Edited 2013-03-10 16:50 UTC





Member since:
2005-11-29
It's a list of companies that support WebM/VP8, and therefore, will not sue anyone for using it. Call it what you will, but the effective outcome is the same.
That's a herculean leap.