Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 10th Mar 2013 13:07 UTC
Multimedia, AV A few days ago, Google and the MPEG-LA announced that they had come to an agreement under which Google received a license for techniques in VP8 that may infringe upon MPEG-LA patents (note the 'if any'). Only a few days later, we learn the real reason behind Google and the MPEG-LA striking a deal, thanks to The H Open, making it clear that the MPEG-LA has lost. Big time. Update: Chris Montgomery: "The wording suggests Google paid some money to grease this along, and the agreement wording is interesting [and instructive] but make no mistake: Google won. Full stop."
Thread beginning with comment 555052
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: Wrong link?
by JAlexoid on Mon 11th Mar 2013 02:53 UTC in reply to "RE[6]: Wrong link?"
Member since:

There are very tricky laws on the books regarding patents and public disclosure, which is why most things regarding IP is heavily secretive.

There is nothing tricky about patent laws and public disclosure. You submit a patent application, that is public disclosure. PERIOD.
Contracts between two or more private parties have no requirement for public disclosure.

Reply Parent Score: 4