Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 10th Mar 2013 13:07 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 555144
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-05-19
What about all other uses?
The fact that they are making an exception for a very narrow case should be clear enough.
The rule is you need a license unless you are under 100k views per year. Not you pay if your content view count is over 100k per year.
Legally the two statements are radically different.
It's like say in that this comment if protected by copyright, but I allow you to use it without express permission when quoting me.