Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 11th Mar 2013 14:46 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 555217
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Sing of the Times
by WorknMan on Tue 12th Mar 2013 19:29
in reply to "RE[2]: Sing of the Times"
Except that you can't 'copy' a car for $0, which makes this analogy a bad one. If you could, you would probably see these same types of restrictions.
As far as uncrackable DRM, how are you going to crack something that runs mostly (or entirely) on a server? Have you ever seen anyone who can play OnLive games for free?




Member since:
2010-06-09
I do... because in doing so they're harming their honest, paying customers. Returning to the car metaphor, what we're seeing is not "needing a key to start your car". What we're seeing is "your car must communicate with us or it won't start, and since we've just discovered the AC, stereo, and ABS brakes create problems with that, we're going to disable those. Also, your car might occasionally fail to start or lock-up randomly."
Yeah, I get that, and I agree the "piracy helps" argument is a lame one. But your paying customers should not be complacent about you breaking their stuff to fight that.
No they won't. Ever. There's always going to be someone who figures out how to get around it. So rather than fight that and piss off all your existing customers as you sell them broken products, maybe your time is better spent proving your product is worth paying for.
Agreed.
You have a point there. You can put Steam in an 'offline' mode where it stores a local copy of your credentials, but you're right, it could be revoked when run online. But while I agree that DRM is vile in general, what makes this case extra heinous though is that given the option between loosening the DRM and harming their loyal, paying customers, they harmed their customers. And that to me is indefensible.