Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 11th Mar 2013 14:46 UTC
Games "To see anyone defending EA and Maxis for the state of SimCity, even were it in perfect working order on launch, depresses me to my core. This self-flagellation-as-skincare notion, where gamers loudly and proudly defend the destruction of their own rights as consumers, is an Orwellian perversity. That it might be considered in any way controversial to call them out on their crap, to point out that no, always-on DRM is not an advantage to anyone, is bewildering. It's a sign of just how far the gaming world has fallen into the rabbit hole of the publisher's burrowing." As usual, RPS hits the nail on the head so hard it shoots through the board.
Thread beginning with comment 555250
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
lucas_maximus
Member since:
2009-08-18

Hmm. YouTube ( https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=geforce+8800+skyrim&oq=...) would seem to disagree with you.


I am quite surprised, but my native res was at 1080p and It didn't work as well as that. I also wonder if that was the 256mb version of the card or the 512mb.

But try Crysis 2 with the same GPU you won't do that well (crashes in the Submarine intro and randomly during gameplay).

Well, I always play at 1080p resolution, that I don't compromise on, and so far I've always been able to play at high details.


Seems a pretty capable card. Maybe it one of those that is a good buy. I think my 8800GT was, I could play games til 2012. I hope my 660GTX was as good of a buy.

Console-games generally aim for 30FPS framerate, not higher.


It okay for some games, but I tend to play FPS on my PC. Assassins Creed on my PS3 I probably won't notice the difference.

No, but the person whom I responded to was talking about having to upgrade the PC every year.


It was a little ridiculous. But it depends how high end you want to be at. My rig apart from the GPU was built in 2007 and it runs stuff fine. The GPU from 2007 ... no way.

I don't think it is right saying that a 5 year old PC can play any game today, because one you don't know what game, what GPU you got (which is the biggest divider these days) and what you performance someone thinks is acceptable.

Which is what I took issue with.

Edited 2013-03-12 21:09 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

WereCatf Member since:
2006-02-15

It was a little ridiculous. But it depends how high end you want to be at. My rig apart from the GPU was built in 2007 and it runs stuff fine. The GPU from 2007 ... no way.

I don't think it is right saying that a 5 year old PC can play any game today, because one you don't know what game, what GPU you got (which is the biggest divider these days) and what you performance someone thinks is acceptable


All that is fine, but it's besides the point: if one makes such a comparison to consoles as OP did then one should also use similar settings and resolution on the PC as the consoles. I mean, of fucking course you're going to need to shell out more money on a PC if you insist on using higher quality settings! Similarly, it's stupid to even mention consoles if their quality settings and resolution ain't enough and yet still insist on yelling about how they're cheaper.

Reply Parent Score: 2

lucas_maximus Member since:
2009-08-18

I am sure you can get some old ass PC playing a game but you won't get an optimal experience.

It is isn't stupid to mention it because it just a discussion.

Reply Parent Score: 2