Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 11th Mar 2013 14:46 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 555250
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[10]: The solution is not simple
by WereCatf on Wed 13th Mar 2013 06:25
in reply to "RE[9]: The solution is not simple"
It was a little ridiculous. But it depends how high end you want to be at. My rig apart from the GPU was built in 2007 and it runs stuff fine. The GPU from 2007 ... no way.
I don't think it is right saying that a 5 year old PC can play any game today, because one you don't know what game, what GPU you got (which is the biggest divider these days) and what you performance someone thinks is acceptable
I don't think it is right saying that a 5 year old PC can play any game today, because one you don't know what game, what GPU you got (which is the biggest divider these days) and what you performance someone thinks is acceptable
All that is fine, but it's besides the point: if one makes such a comparison to consoles as OP did then one should also use similar settings and resolution on the PC as the consoles. I mean, of fucking course you're going to need to shell out more money on a PC if you insist on using higher quality settings! Similarly, it's stupid to even mention consoles if their quality settings and resolution ain't enough and yet still insist on yelling about how they're cheaper.
RE[11]: The solution is not simple
by lucas_maximus on Wed 13th Mar 2013 07:57
in reply to "RE[10]: The solution is not simple"




Member since:
2009-08-18
I am quite surprised, but my native res was at 1080p and It didn't work as well as that. I also wonder if that was the 256mb version of the card or the 512mb.
But try Crysis 2 with the same GPU you won't do that well (crashes in the Submarine intro and randomly during gameplay).
Seems a pretty capable card. Maybe it one of those that is a good buy. I think my 8800GT was, I could play games til 2012. I hope my 660GTX was as good of a buy.
It okay for some games, but I tend to play FPS on my PC. Assassins Creed on my PS3 I probably won't notice the difference.
It was a little ridiculous. But it depends how high end you want to be at. My rig apart from the GPU was built in 2007 and it runs stuff fine. The GPU from 2007 ... no way.
I don't think it is right saying that a 5 year old PC can play any game today, because one you don't know what game, what GPU you got (which is the biggest divider these days) and what you performance someone thinks is acceptable.
Which is what I took issue with.
Edited 2013-03-12 21:09 UTC