Linked by Howard Fosdick on Thu 28th Mar 2013 21:49 UTC
Linux Like many OSNews readers, I use Ubuntu. I also use several less popular distros. What is it like to use these lesser-known distros compared to the dominant systems? How does running, say, VectorLinux or Puppy or PC-BSD, differ from using Ubuntu or Fedora? This article offers a few ideas. Obviously, it broadly generalizes about distros for the purpose of discussion.
Thread beginning with comment 557074
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Not a distro
by judgen on Fri 29th Mar 2013 11:51 UTC in reply to "RE: Not a distro"
Member since:

I never saw the benefit of LMDE compared to Neptune or aptosid. Would you plase care to enlighten me?

(neptune seems to have newer packages of almost all Qt software i use.)

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: Not a distro
by acobar on Fri 29th Mar 2013 13:39 in reply to "RE[2]: Not a distro"
acobar Member since:

I think it depends on whether you miss/want Mint artwork, extensions and Cinnamon/Nemo or not. Like with lots of Debian derivatives it is all about details, and most of the times they are really "subtle".

Anyway, my time trying a lot of distros is over now. I settled around openSUSE (my main option mostly) and LMDE for desktop. On servers I use the usual suspects, CentOS and Debian. For NAS it is OpenMediaVault or FreeNAS. And for a media center is XMBC + Debian.

I really like the fact that with Debian there are lots of stable applications pre-packaged and ready to use but I like also the up-to-date nature of openSUSE for development and yast to easy configuration.

Reply Parent Score: 2