Linked by Howard Fosdick on Thu 28th Mar 2013 21:49 UTC
Linux Like many OSNews readers, I use Ubuntu. I also use several less popular distros. What is it like to use these lesser-known distros compared to the dominant systems? How does running, say, VectorLinux or Puppy or PC-BSD, differ from using Ubuntu or Fedora? This article offers a few ideas. Obviously, it broadly generalizes about distros for the purpose of discussion.
Thread beginning with comment 557121
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Not a distro
by cb88 on Fri 29th Mar 2013 16:57 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Not a distro"
Member since:

PC-BSD is a BSD guess what BSD stands for... you know Berkley System Distribution. so clearly it is a Distro ;)

Reply Parent Score: 6

RE[4]: Not a distro
by krreagan on Fri 29th Mar 2013 19:12 in reply to "RE[3]: Not a distro"
krreagan Member since:

FAIL! "Software" not "System". Trying to be clever?

BSD's are distributions of UNI*. Linux distros are a kernel (Linux) with *BSD, Solaris, AIX, GNU... user land utilities slapped on and configured in various ways.

BTW PC-BSD is still a complete FreeBSD. All the userland apps/utils are still FreeBSD + some additional ones.


Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[5]: Not a distro
by laffer1 on Sat 30th Mar 2013 19:06 in reply to "RE[4]: Not a distro"
laffer1 Member since:

I think the fact that PC-BSD contains FreeBSD is what makes it a distro. They're just value adding stuff on top of someone else's operating system. There are no customizations to the base system.

It's FreeBSD + a different package manager + packages for GUI apps. Debian is a Linux kernel + GNU tool chain + a package manager + packages. I don't see a difference here.

Reply Parent Score: 2