Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 25th Mar 2013 21:09 UTC
Legal Late last week, Nokia dropped what many consider to be a bomb on the WebM project: a list of patents that VP8 supposedly infringes in the form of an IETF IPR declaration. The list has made the rounds around the web, often reported as proof that VP8 infringes upon Nokia's patents. All this stuff rang a bell. Haven't we been here before? Yup, we have, with another open source codec called Opus. Qualcomm and Huawei made the same claims as Nokia did, but they turned out to be complete bogus. As it turns out, this is standard practice in the dirty business of the patent licensing industry.
Thread beginning with comment 557281
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Big picture...
by zima on Mon 1st Apr 2013 22:25 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Big picture..."
Member since:

Here is a list of ARM SoCs (which are used in mobile phones and tablets) from different manufacturers showing which support VP8 and which do not:

Unless you buy Apple gear then your (recent) mobile device is more likely than not to support VP8 decode in hardware. VP8 is getting quite prevalent in terms of adoption, just about every current Android device on the market would support VP8 decode in hardware.

You purposefully misrepresent the situation. Qualcomm SoCs don't support VP8 in hw - and Qualcomm is the gorilla in the room, in great many Android handsets.

Edited 2013-04-01 22:32 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2