Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 2nd Apr 2013 21:06 UTC
In the News "Kay says that some gadgets with superficial Dynabook-like qualities, such as the iPad, have not only failed to realize the Dynabook dream, but have in some senses betrayed it. That's one of the points he makes in this interview, conducted by computer historian David Greelish, proprietor of the Classic Computing Blog and organizer of this month's Vintage Computer Festival Southeast in Atlanta (the Festival will feature a pop-up Apple museum featuring Xerox's groundbreaking Alto workstation, which Kay worked on, as well as devices which deeply reflected his influence, including the Lisa, the original Macintosh and the Newton). Kay and Greelish also discuss Kay's experiences at some of the big outfits where he's worked, including Xerox's fabled PARC labs, Apple, Disney and HP. Today, Kay continues his research about children and technology at his own organization, the Viewpoints Research Institute." A great interview with this legendary man.
Thread beginning with comment 557425
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
kwan_e
Member since:
2007-02-18

Normal people wouldn't have used Dynabook in the way Alan Kay imagined either. They'd probably use it the same way as they do an iPad.

Most people don't use PCs (or Macs) to become artists and authors and other kinds of creative activity that the machine is capable of.

Reply Parent Score: 3

Alfman Member since:
2011-01-28

kwan_e,

"Normal people wouldn't have used Dynabook in the way Alan Kay imagined either. They'd probably use it the same way as they do an iPad."

Nobody anywhere produces as much as they consume, some would still produce very little by choice, and that's ok. The problem with respect to the ipad is that apple has taken form of a dictator. That's a nasty turn in computing, and that's what Alan is criticizing.

Edited 2013-04-03 16:34 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3

kwan_e Member since:
2007-02-18

kwan_e,

"Normal people wouldn't have used Dynabook in the way Alan Kay imagined either. They'd probably use it the same way as they do an iPad."

Nobody anywhere produces as much as they consume, some would still produce very little by choice, and that's ok. The problem with respect to the ipad is that apple has taken form of a dictator. That's a nasty turn in computing, and that's what Alan is criticizing.


That's hardly "worse" than what Alan imagined. What Alan imagined, however glorious, was a pipe dream, and the whole symmetric production and consumption of media IS what he envisioned - which is a point you said you agreed with. Like it or not, someone needed to get the tablet thing started, for greater penetration of powerful mobile computing.

What we have now is better than what Alan's time had, or 10 years ago. I'm not a fan of Apple or its select worshippers on this site, but let's get some reality check. Alan's criticisms are moot because it's obvious that Dynabook isn't going to come about in one big step. However, it is obvious that we're heading there. The technology is already beyond what we need. The policy limitations are the hurdles here.

You can't criticize the [class of] device for being under the control of its designer[s].

Reply Parent Score: 3