Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 4th Nov 2005 14:41 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 55812
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: money for nothing?
by Ramsees2 on Fri 4th Nov 2005 20:03
in reply to "RE[4]: money for nothing?"
Excuse me, but in my world, developers cost more or less 500€ a day.
Excuse me, but in poor countries there's no chance a developer spend so much money on a expensive Qt license, and there's is where GTK is beter welcome. Qt is for richter like adove and Google, but for the people GTK is the choice.
RE[6]: money for nothing?
by lezard on Fri 4th Nov 2005 20:08
in reply to "RE[5]: money for nothing?"
RE[6]: money for nothing?
by segedunum on Fri 4th Nov 2005 22:03
in reply to "RE[5]: money for nothing?"
Excuse me, but in poor countries there's no chance a developer spend so much money on a expensive Qt license
If you can't afford a Qt license, or indeed, any other type of license, then any software you sell isn't going to make very much or sell at all and you're not going to make a any kind of a living out of it. Yes, in a developing country.






Member since:
2005-10-11
Excuse me, but in my world, developers cost more or less 500€ a day. That means that if I think I can save by using QT 6 days of work, it is a good investment.