Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 13th Apr 2013 20:14 UTC
In the News Martin Hedberg has interviewed Jean-Louis Gassee - founder of Be, Inc. and former Apple executive. We're looking at 45 minutes (part 1, 2, 3, and 4) of talk about operating systems an their future, so sit down, relaxe, and enjoy.
Thread beginning with comment 558560
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Excellent!
by moondevil on Mon 15th Apr 2013 17:25 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: Excellent!"
moondevil
Member since:
2005-07-08

How is this different from the commercial software you get access to the source code, like game development middleware?

For me if you prevent any form of redistribution, it is commercial software.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[7]: Excellent!
by Neolander on Mon 15th Apr 2013 17:54 in reply to "RE[6]: Excellent!"
Neolander Member since:
2010-03-08

My point is precisely that selling software is not fundamentally incompatible with sharing source code. And once the source code is shared, you get most of the benefits that people normally associate to open source : ability to know what the software you own does, to point its flaws, to toy with it so as to improve your programming knowledge...

Sure, you can't make an incompatible fork of that software and sell it (like Amazon with Android), nor create a free clone of a commercially supported product (like CentOS with RHEL), but I'm not sure that being able to do that is really a quality of the open source ecosystem. More like a nasty side effect of some people's quest for unconditional software "freedom", in my view.

Edited 2013-04-15 17:58 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[7]: Excellent!
by jared_wilkes on Mon 15th Apr 2013 20:25 in reply to "RE[6]: Excellent!"
jared_wilkes Member since:
2011-04-25

"For me if you prevent any form of redistribution, it is commercial software."

That's a silly definition. Commercial software is paid software, period. Whether you are free to distribute it or not, whether it is open source or not.

Applying nonsensical definitions to words that have a shared meaning is violence against language. There is no dictionary in the world that defines "commercial" as "unable to be redistributed by an end user."

Reply Parent Score: 2