Linked by JRepin on Mon 29th Apr 2013 09:24 UTC
Linux After ten weeks of development Linus Torvalds has announced the release of Linux kernel 3.9. The latest version of the kernel now has a device mapper target which allows a user to setup an SSD as a cache for hard disks to boost disk performance under load. There's also kernel support for multiple processes waiting for requests on the same port, a feature which will allow it to distribute server work better across multiple CPU cores. KVM virtualisation is now available on ARM processors and RAID 5 and 6 support has been added to Btrfs's existing RAID 0 and 1 handling. Linux 3.9 also has a number of new and improved drivers which means the kernel now supports the graphics cores in AMD's next generation of APUs and also works with the high-speed 802.11ac Wi-Fi chips which will likely appear in Intel's next mobile platform. Read more about new features in What's new in Linux 3.9.
Thread beginning with comment 560048
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Load of works there
by voidlogic on Mon 29th Apr 2013 15:06 UTC in reply to "Load of works there"
voidlogic
Member since:
2005-09-03

Micro-kernel is mostly run-time distinction; you can write a kernel with well defined modules that have defined interfaces for communication, but if they run in the same address space and thus gain efficiency they are will be less secure, but if the modules have their own address spaces and use message passing they gain security but lose efficiency. Linux decided a long time ago to share a kernel address space.

Reply Parent Score: 6

RE[2]: Load of works there
by Kochise on Mon 29th Apr 2013 18:24 in reply to "RE: Load of works there"
Kochise Member since:
2006-03-03

I know that :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanenbaum–Torvalds_debate

The result is here, compare with the EU funded Minix3 OS :

http://www.minix3.org/

Now which one is the most usable ? Which is the most portable ? FPU support was added to Minix3 through a Google Summer of code, have no extension support (MMX, SSE, ...) and do not run on ARM.

Linux, on the other hand...

Kochise

Edited 2013-04-29 18:27 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: Load of works there
by Brendan on Mon 29th Apr 2013 21:31 in reply to "RE[2]: Load of works there"
Brendan Member since:
2005-11-16

Hi,

Now which one is the most usable ? Which is the most portable ? FPU support was added to Minix3 through a Google Summer of code, have no extension support (MMX, SSE, ...) and do not run on ARM.

Linux, on the other hand...


You're comparing something designed for students to learn from to a commercial OS backed by large companies (RedHat, Novell, Intel, IBM, Oracle, Google, etc)? Are you the sort of person that does a victory lap after they've stepped on a small bug?

- Brendan

Reply Parent Score: 1