Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 29th Apr 2013 21:14 UTC
Mac OS X "OS X 10.9, which is internally codenamed 'Cabernet', will focus on various 'power-user' enhancements and take core features from iOS, according to our sources. Unlike operating system updates such as OS X Leopard and OS X Lion, OS X 10.9 will likely not be an overhauled approach to how the operating system feels and functions." Features for power users and features from iOS? Seems like an oxymoron. Still, if they manage to finally fix the Finder and Spaces, I'll be happy.
Thread beginning with comment 560084
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Finder
by wojtek on Mon 29th Apr 2013 21:48 UTC
wojtek
Member since:
2010-01-24

Well, as a new mac user I generally like the osx, but there are quirks here and there that makes me want bang my head against the wall... hard... - one of the things is editable path in finder - Windows, Gnome, KDE....one can copy it, edit, etc... not in Finder - tiny thing but highly annoying...

Reply Score: 1

RE: Finder
by henderson101 on Mon 29th Apr 2013 23:12 in reply to "Finder"
henderson101 Member since:
2006-05-30

Command + Shift + G

That will open a prompt that will allow you to browse using Finder to the location you type/paste in.

Going to be honest, 99% of the time I use Spotlight.

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[2]: Finder
by galvanash on Mon 29th Apr 2013 23:38 in reply to "RE: Finder"
galvanash Member since:
2006-01-25

Command + Shift + G

That will open a prompt that will allow you to browse using Finder to the location you type/paste in.

Going to be honest, 99% of the time I use Spotlight.


Your right but I agree with the OP on this one... The UI sets up inconsistent expectations when it comes to this particular widget...

1. There is a Command combo for "Go to folder" and "Connect to Server". Im fine with that, the more keyboard shortcuts the better.

2. Under the "Go" menu on finder, both of these items appear at the very bottom of the menu, grouped together - my assumption is that they do this because both of these operations are context-insensitive. Makes sense to me.

3. If you try to customize the finder toolbar, there is an item for "Connect" which is essentially a toolbar shortcut for "Connect to Server". There is, however, no corresponding button for "Open Folder".

???

Why? Why does "Connect" get special treatment here. If anything "Open Folder" is a much more common operation... I would get the logic if ALL of the items on the toolbar were context sensitive, but "Connect" isn't and it still gets love... Everywhere else the two seem to be paired together.

I don't get it. All I want is a button for it. It doesn't have to be a default item - I can add it myself, but they have to make it available in order for me to do that...

If anyone at Apple is listening... I want a button for "Enclosing Folder" too ;) I know the difference between "Up" and "Back" even if most of your users don't. Making me use keyboard shortcuts for this when you could just add a button on a customization menu is user-hostile. The people who don't know the difference between "Up" and "Back" are the same people who wouldn't know how to customize the finder toolbar anyway...

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[2]: Finder
by wojtek on Tue 30th Apr 2013 06:06 in reply to "RE: Finder"
wojtek Member since:
2010-01-24

I know that one but it's behaviour is baffling for me - why it can't show location of the current folder instead of the last one typed in? Without it, it's kinda annoying to use... (yes, I know about services, automator and option to create shortcut to the file/folder but it would be million times easier to simply type mentioned shortcut and copy-paste, even part of, the path)

Reply Parent Score: 0

RE: Finder
by fithisux on Wed 1st May 2013 11:33 in reply to "Finder"
fithisux Member since:
2006-01-22

That is why a pure Darwin OS with X or DirectFB and some stock DE would make a difference. Apple could even charge for it in the form of a supported package or allow to boot to such an environment in their commercial CD and give a push to the OSS packagers.

They provide the source and have a fantastic OSS community but they are not able to take advantage. Why?

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: Finder
by jared_wilkes on Wed 1st May 2013 23:14 in reply to "RE: Finder"
jared_wilkes Member since:
2011-04-25

How advantageous is it? And do they have to address it just because you want them too?

Reply Parent Score: 2