Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 29th Apr 2013 21:14 UTC
Mac OS X "OS X 10.9, which is internally codenamed 'Cabernet', will focus on various 'power-user' enhancements and take core features from iOS, according to our sources. Unlike operating system updates such as OS X Leopard and OS X Lion, OS X 10.9 will likely not be an overhauled approach to how the operating system feels and functions." Features for power users and features from iOS? Seems like an oxymoron. Still, if they manage to finally fix the Finder and Spaces, I'll be happy.
Thread beginning with comment 560170
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: OpenGL & filesystem
by tylerdurden on Tue 30th Apr 2013 17:43 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: OpenGL & filesystem"
tylerdurden
Member since:
2009-03-17

HFS+ is "reliable" because frankly, it doesn't do much. IMO it's kind of pathetic that a cash flushed tech company like Apple is so behind the curve when it comes to some fundamental computing technologies. Specially since they love to brand their desktop OS as "the most advanced OS in the world."

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[5]: OpenGL & filesystem
by henderson101 on Wed 1st May 2013 09:15 in reply to "RE[4]: OpenGL & filesystem"
henderson101 Member since:
2006-05-30

Well, that's a pretty vague retort, if you don't mind me saying. What is it you expect is should be doing that it doesn't?

It journals, it has case sensitivity, it stores metadata (has the notion of forks), includes ACL's and UNIX permissions. It does tick a lot of boxes. Spotlight was also developed by a team containing Dominic Giampaolo, who was part of the engineering team that created the BFS for BeOS. Fairly sure he still works for Apple in the Filesystems division also.

But you obviously believe something is missing, and I'm genuinely intrigued as to what that is?

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[6]: OpenGL & filesystem
by tylerdurden on Wed 1st May 2013 16:55 in reply to "RE[5]: OpenGL & filesystem"
tylerdurden Member since:
2009-03-17

It's the XXI century, support for case sensitivity has been a given for 2 to 3 decades. And yet, it is an after thought in HFS+'s implementation, to the point that some applications still can't function on a case sensitive HFS+ volume in 2013. That is sad. Even sadder that Apple still touts "case sensitivity" as a major feature for their "most advanced OS on earth."

For a more detailed take on the issue, I will refer to Syracusa's review on ars technica:

http://arstechnica.com/apple/2011/07/mac-os-x-10-7/12/#hfs-problems



There is a reason why the Xserves and OSX as a server were laughed out of the marketplace.

Reply Parent Score: 2