Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 1st May 2013 21:35 UTC
Hardware, Embedded Systems "The Q1 2013 numbers from IDC, a technology and telecommunications research firm who keeps track of this sort of thing, show that Android tablets now lead the market with a 56.5-percent share. The 27,800,000 units shipped in the quarter is a 247-percent improvement from this time last year, when just 8,000,000 units were shipped. It's important to note that this increase doesn't come at the expense of Apple, who shipped 65.3-percent more tablets in Q1 2013 than they did in Q1 2012 - it shows the market is growing, and the lions share of new purchases are Android." While Android's market share growth scares me, it's good that it's not really harming the competition. Also, maybe this will be the carrot for developers to improve Android tablet applications.
Thread beginning with comment 560351
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: OK, fine, and now...
by majipoor on Thu 2nd May 2013 19:14 UTC in reply to "RE: OK, fine, and now..."
majipoor
Member since:
2009-01-22

"Android accused of monopoly by Microsoft, Apple, etc." ?

... Or do you think that they other companies will accuse Google of abusing its Monopoly position?
"

They already did: Microsoft accuse Google of monopoly abuse in EU.

http://blogs.computerworld.com/cloud-computing/22027/irony-alert-mi...

I would not say they are wrong or right: I personally think that Google is no better than Microsoft when dealing with their monopoly in their respective market.

Many think Google is the nice guy because they are more consumer-friendly (everything free and "open"), but they are more consumer-friendly because it is their business model, not because they are actually a nice guy.

Edited 2013-05-02 19:18 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[3]: OK, fine, and now...
by lemur2 on Fri 3rd May 2013 11:38 in reply to "RE[2]: OK, fine, and now..."
lemur2 Member since:
2007-02-17

Many think Google is the nice guy because they are more consumer-friendly (everything free and "open"), but they are more consumer-friendly because it is their business model, not because they are actually a nice guy.


Agreed.

Another point to make is that in their own best interests consumers should obviously support businesses with a consumer-friendly business model.

Another point to make is that governments should also support whatever is in the best interests of the majority of citizens. To my mind, it is therefore unarguably the case that governments should support businesses with a consumer-friendly business model over and above businesses with a rip-everybody-off+whatever-the-market-will-bear business model.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: OK, fine, and now...
by Nelson on Fri 3rd May 2013 17:38 in reply to "RE[3]: OK, fine, and now..."
Nelson Member since:
2005-11-29

I disagree, Google has shown a willingness to change this behavior when their business needs change. Its all a facade.

Reply Parent Score: 3