Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 6th May 2013 20:17 UTC
Graphics, User Interfaces "Adobe first launched Creative Suite 1 back in 2003, and now, ten years and six versions later, the company is taking a left turn: Adobe is abandoning its Creative Suite entirely to focus efforts on Creative Cloud."
Thread beginning with comment 560746
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: GIMP
by Jondice on Tue 7th May 2013 13:51 UTC in reply to "RE: GIMP"
Jondice
Member since:
2006-09-20

Also, this may be news to you, but a lot of people aren't always using legit copies.

I think rather than switch to GIMP in the short term, these people will keep on using the "old" CS versions for years.

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[3]: GIMP
by TM99 on Tue 7th May 2013 15:05 in reply to "RE[2]: GIMP"
TM99 Member since:
2012-08-26

I had missed this tidbit, but apparently Adobe already took done activation servers for CS1 and CS2. Now they put up links for downloadable copies that have serials that don't require activation BUT you are not supposed to use them unless you already owned the product.

For some kid or mom who really only needs ACDSee or Elements at best, that is fine. But if I was a semi-pro users that is disturbing.

Will Adobe eventually remove activation service for all past versions of the Creative Suite except for the current Creative Cloud one?

At that point, yes, GIMP is starting to look better and better. I personally have used it for some time and it is on par with at least Photoshop 7 which I also still use because of the plugin support. Between those two on XP Mode on a Windows 7 x64 Pro workstation with 16GB of RAM, I am fine for any semi-pro graphics manipulation I might need. For me, it is my photography. For my wife, it is digital art and graphics design for other small businesses in our market segment.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: GIMP
by lucas_maximus on Wed 8th May 2013 01:32 in reply to "RE[2]: GIMP"
lucas_maximus Member since:
2009-08-18

Sorry but GIMP is utter garbage. While it maybe the only free alternative, doesn't mean it is worth while.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: GIMP
by Sodki on Wed 8th May 2013 07:40 in reply to "RE[3]: GIMP"
Sodki Member since:
2005-11-10

Sorry but GIMP is utter garbage. While it maybe the only free alternative, doesn't mean it is worth while.


Not this crap again. I don't care if you like GIMP or not: I like it, I use it, and I am not alone in this. Also, GIMP is not the only free alternative, there are a few ones, including Krita.

But please, justify yourself: why is it "garbage"? Is it lacking the features? Is it lacking support? Or are you saying that because the interface is not like Photoshop? If it's the latter, your argument is very, very weak.

Reply Parent Score: 3