Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 11th May 2013 21:41 UTC
Windows "Windows is indeed slower than other operating systems in many scenarios, and the gap is worsening." That's one way to start an insider explanation of why Windows' performance isn't up to snuff. Written by someone who actually contributes code to the Windows NT kernel, the comment on Hacker News, later deleted but reposted with permission on Marc Bevand's blog, paints a very dreary picture of the state of Windows development. The root issue? Think of how Linux is developed, and you'll know the answer.
Thread beginning with comment 561464
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
lucas_maximus
Member since:
2009-08-18

LOL


Is that your argument?

It all anecdotal evidence, unless someone produces some real numbers.

Reply Parent Score: 2

tylerdurden Member since:
2009-03-17

I was just confused as to what recognizing that you had no idea of what you were doing, in a specific matter, had to do with the general scheme of things.

Reply Parent Score: 1

lucas_maximus Member since:
2009-08-18

Pathetic as always.

We are talking about performance, I stuck in my 2 cents for what it is worth.

I know it isn't a good measure and I don't pretend it is.

I was more interested in the fact that Windows 8 works pretty well in a VM and it seems to have some compositing, whereas Gnome 3 runs like dirt with the same allocated video memory.

Edited 2013-05-13 22:06 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2