Linked by MOS6510 on Fri 17th May 2013 22:22 UTC
Hardware, Embedded Systems "It is good for programmers to understand what goes on inside a processor. The CPU is at the heart of our career. What goes on inside the CPU? How long does it take for one instruction to run? What does it mean when a new CPU has a 12-stage pipeline, or 18-stage pipeline, or even a 'deep' 31-stage pipeline? Programs generally treat the CPU as a black box. Instructions go into the box in order, instructions come out of the box in order, and some processing magic happens inside. As a programmer, it is useful to learn what happens inside the box. This is especially true if you will be working on tasks like program optimization. If you don't know what is going on inside the CPU, how can you optimize for it? This article is about what goes on inside the x86 processor's deep pipeline."
Thread beginning with comment 561962
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by Drumhellar
by theosib on Sat 18th May 2013 03:44 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Drumhellar"
theosib
Member since:
2006-03-02

Let me put this another way: The number of instructions per clock (IPC) of a scalar in-order processor is much less than 1, because there are many types of multi-cycle instructions. Adding out-of-order allows instruction fetch to continue despite the multi-cycle instructions, as long as those instruction are not dependent on the executing multi-cycle instructions. That brings the IPC closer to 1, but it cannot exceed 1. The objective of Superscalar is to make IPC exceed 1, and it does this, most primarily, by making instruction fetch and decode process multiple instructions per cycle. Whether or not you combine these ideas, superscalar invariably needs to have rendant functional units for some instruction types in order to actually achieve the goal of IPC > 1, in part because the majority of instructons are simple single-cycle integer instructions, so you'll get lots of them together.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[4]: Comment by Drumhellar
by tylerdurden on Sat 18th May 2013 03:51 in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by Drumhellar"
tylerdurden Member since:
2009-03-17

... which is why I said "theoretical" IPCs > 1. ;-)

Cheers.

Reply Parent Score: 2