Linked by nej_simon on Mon 27th May 2013 22:25 UTC
Gnome "At the Tizen conference this week in San Francisco, Intel showed off an Intel Ultrabook running their next-generation Tizen 3.0 platform that's using a shell/desktop derived from GNOME 3.x."
Thread beginning with comment 563015
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Why GTK?
by darknexus on Tue 28th May 2013 12:36 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Why GTK?"
Member since:

Because GTK is unfathomable, while Qt is easy?

If you really find GTK+ to be unfathomable, remind me never to hire you as a coder. It's overly verbose and a bit convoluted, but by no means unfathomable.

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[4]: Why GTK?
by Lobotomik on Tue 28th May 2013 13:13 in reply to "RE[3]: Why GTK?"
Lobotomik Member since:

Mmm, please, let me reword:

Because it is extremely wordy and convoluted while Qt is easy?

Edited 2013-05-28 13:15 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[5]: Why GTK?
by Hiev on Tue 28th May 2013 15:23 in reply to "RE[4]: Why GTK?"
Hiev Member since:

"extremely wordy" is not a valid reason to discard a toolkit, I could write your statement as "it makes code easier to read", now convoluted? how so?.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: Why GTK?
by segedunum on Wed 29th May 2013 07:22 in reply to "RE[3]: Why GTK?"
segedunum Member since:

If you put GTK in front of your average Windows or Mac developer who has no notion of Linux GUI politics they're going to laugh in your face at the prospect of using it, and then have the blood drain out of their face as they realise you are serious.

I would never hire anyone who thought it was a good idea to use it. Anyone who does has too much Linux desktop history about them and I think that's the mistake Intel have made here.

Edited 2013-05-29 07:24 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 6