Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 4th Jun 2013 12:45 UTC
Legal Ah, patents - the never-ending scourge of the technology industry. Whether wielded by companies who don't actually make any products, or large corporations who abuse them because they can't compete in the market place or because they're simply jerks, they do the industry a huge disservice and are simply plain dangerous. According to The Wall Street Journal (circumvention link), president Obama is about to take several executive actions to address patent trolls - which may seem like a good idea, but I am very worried that all this will do is strengthen the positions of notorious patent system abusers such as Apple and Microsoft.
Thread beginning with comment 563713
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Comment by MOS6510
by JAlexoid on Wed 5th Jun 2013 09:17 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by MOS6510"
JAlexoid
Member since:
2009-05-19

Yes, it does. Apple is no exception to the precedent case law application. Apple is not the only one, though.

Your focus on Apple is very much misplaced, since you can say the same about Microsoft and most other big players. In fact, Microsoft has spawned more than Apple can dream of in small businesses and jobs. Their business partner programme is second to none.

PS: Apple "trolled" in Europe - a Spanish tablet maker and a German one. Much smaller targets than Microsoft's targets were/are.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[6]: Comment by MOS6510
by MOS6510 on Wed 5th Jun 2013 09:35 in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by MOS6510"
MOS6510 Member since:
2011-05-12

My focus is on Apple because someone else keeps saying Apple does this or that, but without giving any examples. It has reached a dogmatic state.

I don't know about those cases you mentioned, but if Apple sues them it's most likely those companies made rather exact copies of Apple products.

Apple tends to go after companies that pose real threats or misuse the Apple brand, product names or logos. I don't think that's unreasonable, although I think they sometimes go to far with anything that starts with a small i. It's probably their legal department acting on their own rather than a CEO call.

That haven't said a thing about HP and their new line of Apple product look-a-likes. Go to a toy store and you'll find media players and tablets that are obviously Apple inspired. If they weren't so crappy I might even buy some just for the fun of it.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[7]: Comment by MOS6510
by Kivada on Wed 5th Jun 2013 10:03 in reply to "RE[6]: Comment by MOS6510"
Kivada Member since:
2010-07-07

My favorite was always that early Chinese knockoff of the iPod, where they cloned it completely but also improved upon it by adding support for every codec the hardware supported and adding an FM tuner. They even cloned the silhouette ads for their product.

I never did get one though, but it was very tempting since without comparing audio and build quality, the knockoff was the better buy.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[7]: Comment by MOS6510
by JAlexoid on Wed 5th Jun 2013 15:00 in reply to "RE[6]: Comment by MOS6510"
JAlexoid Member since:
2009-05-19

I don't know about those cases you mentioned, but if Apple sues them it's most likely those companies made rather exact copies of Apple products.

Obviously you don't otherwise you wouldn't say that they don't sue. Also rationalising the actions, that contradict your own statements... classic sign of a fanboi.

Here is the link with the pic of the "infringing" tablet: http://www.phonearena.com/news/Small-Spanish-tablet-maker-wins-Appl...

Reply Parent Score: 4