Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 8th Jun 2013 14:57 UTC
And yes, the PRISM scandal is far, far from over. More and more information keeps leaking out, and the more gets out, the worse it gets. The companies involved have sent out official statements - often by mouth of their CEOs - and what's interesting is that not only are these official statements eerily similar to each other, using the same terms clearly designed by lawyers, they also directly contradict new reports from The New York Times. So, who is lying?
Thread beginning with comment 564114
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:2010-09-23
Contrary to what Tom says, not all of them mentioned DIRECT Access in their press release:
Then there's AOL:
We do not have any knowledge of the Prism program. We do not disclose user information to government agencies without a court order, subpoena or formal legal process, nor do we provide any government agency with access to our servers.
RE[3]: Comment by Nelson
by UltraZelda64 on Sat 8th Jun 2013 17:52
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Nelson"
Member since:2006-12-05
Member since:
2013-06-07
Why it's not "direct access" really:
http://www.theverge.com/2013/6/7/4408256/tech-companies-reportedly-...