Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 5th Nov 2005 17:51 UTC, submitted by AdriAn Avila
Novell and Ximian Rumors circulating that Novell is going to kill off its popular Linux desktop lines are completely false. [However,] Novell is making one large strategic change. The GNOME interface is going to become the default interface on both the SLES and Novell Linux Desktop line. KDE libraries will be supplied on both, but the bulk of Novell's interface moving forward will be on GNOME. "The entire KDE graphical interface and product family will continue to be supported and delivered on OpenSuSE."
Thread beginning with comment 56425
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
kde seems nicer
by on Sat 5th Nov 2005 18:33 UTC

Member since:

Kde seems to have many nice features that gnome does not have.

Things like kate and the tabular console window, etc.

I don't like the 'bare bones' feeling of gnome.

It seems like this decision is based more on politics than anything technical.

I really wish one desktop environment would 'win' this war. Having 2 different desktops is stupid, unless you are a geek.

If linux ever wants to go mainstream, we need more we should let KDE kill gnome.

Reply Score: 0

RE: kde seems nicer
by sonic1001 on Sat 5th Nov 2005 18:37 in reply to "kde seems nicer"
sonic1001 Member since:

Gnome-terminal has had tab functionality for a long time.

/*I really wish one desktop environment would 'win' this war.*/

Your wish is coming true, everyone is standarizing on GNOME.

Reply Parent Score: 0

RE[2]: kde seems nicer
by on Sat 5th Nov 2005 18:53 in reply to "RE: kde seems nicer"
Member since:

Also I like the version of Gedit that comes with Gnome 2.12 now. I used to use Kate but now use Gedit. It has tabs too.

Reply Parent Score: 0

RE: kde seems nicer
by on Sun 6th Nov 2005 18:50 in reply to "kde seems nicer"
Member since:

I often encounter the idea that FOSS "fails" because of effort duplication ("Why don't "they" just do one good Desktop/Distribution/etc ?" type of saying), especially from newcomers and outsiders. I think this is totally missing the point.

Some people tends to consider the FOSS community as some monolithic company who would be developping two (or more) competing softwares for the same field, thus failing to complete any of them. But in the FOSS community, you have little chance to see someone working on a project he doesn't believe in. FOSS developpers do write software for fun and this allows them to make decisions based on personnal point of views (and hopefully technical ones) rather then commercial considerations. Freedom it is. So there is no point in creating lots of code if it's not Good or if the engeneering is poor. There's of course much more to say as to why FOSS is a pleasant place to be as a developper but about the question of effort duplication i really can't settle anywhere else than "it's all for the best".

Reply Parent Score: 1