Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 11th Jun 2013 17:07 UTC
Apple We already talked about iOS 7 yesterday (after a night of sleep, it's only looking worse and worse - look at this, for Fiona's sake!), so now it's time to talk about the downright stunning and belly flutters-inducing new Mac Pro. As former owner and huge, huge, huge fan of the PowerMac G4 Cube - I haven't been this excited about an Apple product since, well, I would say the iMac G4. This is the Apple I used to love.
Thread beginning with comment 564466
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: I think it's exciting
by whartung on Tue 11th Jun 2013 22:35 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: I think it's exciting"
Member since:

Sorry, I misread your comment I guess.

Still 10 years out of the same machine, in a field which advances almost exponentially seems not that feasible. Of course that depends on usage patterns for the machine...

Truth, but to be fair, save for select fields, while machines continue to get faster and faster, software is not quite outpacing them in terms of demands for resources.

The biggest demands of modern software is mostly memory. CPU demands have somewhat increased, but even today much of that need is being met by multiple cores since they're now ubiquitous (cores I have).

Compilers don't need exponential more amounts of CPU, databases don't, word processing doesn't, etc. The largest consumer of CPU resources is video, and the other growth consumer is video games and GPUs. Since I run a Mac, I've already disqualified myself in being a high end gamer. But, say, Diablo 3, runs fine, as an example. (I upgraded the GPU once couple years ago. The existing card failed.) I also don't do any video work.

The other bottleneck was I/O and SSDs have "solved" that problem for the mid-term. Now, memory is the new disk, to the point that Apple (among others I'm sure) is willing to "sacrifice" abundant CPU resources for memory by compressing idle VM pages.

Clearly the software has become more complex, does more things, is "slower" over time given static hardware environment. But the differences aren't dramatic enough that "seat of the pants" notices it. I do not consider my machine to be "slow" today. Rather, it's "fast enough".

By over specifying and over building early, I save myself from mucking with hardware, upgrading, moving software, etc. on a "routine" basis. A frustrating and painful experience in most cases, even on a Mac. I don't enjoy messing with computers.

Plug it in, set it up, plug in a Time Machine drive, hit "update" when it lights up. Blow the cat fur out maybe once a year.

7 years, and I've lost my Time Machine drive once, and the video card died on me. I think my DVD is sick too.

Reply Parent Score: 4