Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 18th Jun 2013 22:33 UTC
Apple Official Apple statement on PRISM and privacy: "Regardless of the circumstances, our Legal team conducts an evaluation of each request and, only if appropriate, we retrieve and deliver the narrowest possible set of information to the authorities. In fact, from time to time when we see inconsistencies or inaccuracies in a request, we will refuse to fulfill it." This is basically Apple re-publishing their earlier statement in a more official manner. You either believe it, or you don't.
Thread beginning with comment 564954
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Comment by marcp
by marcp on Wed 19th Jun 2013 09:46 UTC
Member since:

Apple itself rapes users privacy like a pro [sic!], so it doesn't matter if it gives that data to other parties or not.

Reply Score: 1

RE: Comment by marcp
by MOS6510 on Wed 19th Jun 2013 09:55 in reply to "Comment by marcp"
MOS6510 Member since:

We'd love some examples of that.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE: Comment by marcp
by majipoor on Wed 19th Jun 2013 10:02 in reply to "Comment by marcp"
majipoor Member since:

Whether people hate the USA or Apple (or whatever I guess), it is always the same story: they hate it so they turn any piece of news into another reason to hate it even more and if necessary they invent "facts".

I would hate to be a hater ;)

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: Comment by marcp
by Kochise on Wed 19th Jun 2013 11:00 in reply to "RE: Comment by marcp"
Kochise Member since:

Then stories like faked anthrax, no found weapons of mass destruction, civilians killed by US troopers, citizens reviewed under "Prism", etc... arise to consolidate the claims.

There is no even needs of conspiracy theory or aliens coming for outa space, US if already one of a crazed country that copied much of its running from USSR : hidden secretive agencies, brain washing news, favoring industrial and military oligarchy, ...


Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[2]: Comment by marcp
by tylerdurden on Wed 19th Jun 2013 17:25 in reply to "RE: Comment by marcp"
tylerdurden Member since:

... oddly enough the "easily" concerned follow similarly predictive patterns as well.

Reply Parent Score: 2