Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 21st Jun 2013 08:32 UTC
Google Reddit user mr03 created a very thorough visual comparison to show just how much Android has changed over the years. No text, just pictures. It's amazing how dated older releases look.
Thread beginning with comment 565218
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Huh
by Troels on Fri 21st Jun 2013 09:00 UTC in reply to "Huh"
Troels
Member since:
2005-07-11

I agree. Sure, some of the of the screens look dated on the old releases, especially the status bar and the widgets, but the way it works is remarkably unchanged.

Not complaining though, i like the Holo look&feel and i think it gets things done easily without much fuss, the only thing that bugs me is the default icons, to me they look like something from Linux in the 90s or early 00s, especially the phone icon. Luckily that was fixable with the right launcher.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: Huh
by Laurence on Fri 21st Jun 2013 10:22 in reply to "RE: Huh"
Laurence Member since:
2007-03-26

I've owned a handset that's ran pretty much every version of Android (as my main phone as well). So I've seen the evolution first hand. And personally I don't think icons were that bad in real life. But you have to bare in mind the competition back then looked worse (iOS being the exception).

What I always hated was the mesh background that sat behind the icons. Even back when Android 1.5 and 1.6 was new, I thought that looked dated. In fact I'd go further and say down right crappy. I didn't like the graphic for the handle of the icon draw either (though I did like the usability of it).

Reply Parent Score: 4